Extractive industry dominates billion-dollar ISDS claims.

Posted : October 22, 2023

The global energy industry has always been a lucrative one, but it seems that oil, gas and mining companies have taken it to another level. According to reports, these industries have lodged more claims than any other, with some awards even reaching into the billions of dollars. The 12 companies with the largest claims against governments represent only a fraction of the industry, which is now under scrutiny for the social and environmental impact of their operations. Despite this, the sector's financial power and political influence remain largely unchallenged.
1. Oil, gas, and mining companies have lodged more claims than any other industry, with some awards reaching into the billions of dollars.
2. The 12 companies with the largest claims against governments represent only a fraction of the industry, highlighting the widespread nature of these claims.
3. The financial power and political influence of the energy sector remain largely unchallenged despite scrutiny of their social and environmental impact.
4. The 12 largest arbitration awards across all industries have all been granted to oil, gas, and mining companies, raising concerns about power imbalances and exploitation.
5. The lucrative nature of industry claims has sparked a debate about transparency and inherent issues within the arbitration process.
The 12 largest claims made by oil, gas, and mining companies against governments have reached into the billions of dollars, highlighting the industry's immense financial power.
The 12 largest arbitration awards across all industries have all been granted to oil, gas, and mining companies, further highlighting the significance of their claims. These massive payouts have raised concerns among environmentalists and local communities, as they often involve disputes over natural resources and land rights. The lucrative nature of these industry claims has triggered a debate about the inherent power imbalances, potential exploitation, and lack of transparency within the arbitration process.