The state has recently revealed that experts specialising in the field of climate change employed by oil companies had previously issued numerous warnings to their respective company executives about imminent environmental impacts. However, it appears that these critical suggestions and revelations were either ignored or severely downplayed, raising pertinent questions about corporate responsibility and accountability in the face of global climate change. Despite their extensive insight and expertise, these professionals faced obstacles when it came to driving necessary change within their organisations, reflecting the industry's broader trend of climate change denial or deflection. But why was their advice neglected and how has this lack of action contributed to the current climate crisis?
1. Climate change experts employed by oil companies had previously issued warnings about impending environmental impacts to their company executives.
2. These critical suggestions and warnings were ignored or significantly downplayed, raising concerns about corporate responsibility and accountability.
3. Despite their expertise, these professionals faced challenges in driving necessary changes within their organizations due to a widespread trend of climate change denial.
4. Instead of taking immediate action, the executives continued their environmentally damaging practices and allegedly funded campaigns to mislead the public and deny the science their experts were citing.
5. This strategy suggests a strong disconnect between the advice given by the scientists and the actions of the executives within these oil companies, raising questions about corporate ethics and responsibility towards climate change.
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, nearly 80% of scientific experts employed by ExxonMobil between the years 1977 to 2014 had accurately predicted and warned the company executives about the dangers of global warming and climate change, yet their warnings were routinely dismissed.
But rather than take immediate action to curb their impact, it appears that the executives chose to ignore these warnings. Not only did they continue their environmentally damaging practices, but they also allegedly funded campaigns to mislead the public and deny the very science their experts were citing. This dubious strategy has raised many questions around the corporate ethics and responsibility of these oil companies towards climate change. It suggests a strong disconnect between the advise given by their scientists and the actions of the management.